Current:Home > MyWorld’s Leading Polluters Have Racked Up a $10 Trillion Carbon Debt -StockSource
World’s Leading Polluters Have Racked Up a $10 Trillion Carbon Debt
View
Date:2025-04-18 13:28:57
The countries most responsible for global warming owe the rest of the world a tremendous debt, with the author of a new study published Monday in the journal Nature Climate Change putting the figure at $10 trillion.
The author came up with that number by calculating how much CO2 each country emitted per capita since 1960, generally recognized as the onset of the worst of human-caused global warming. Countries with high per capita emissions carry a carbon debt while countries with lower per capita emissions have a carbon credit.
“We in the rich world have over-contributed to the problem and consequently there is a debt associated with that that needs to be honored in some way,” said lead author Damon Matthews a researcher at Concordia University in Montreal, Canada.
That was the purpose of the Green Climate Fund, established in 2010 by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) to help vulnerable countries address the challenges of climate change. Its initial goal was to distribute $100 billion each year in public and private funding until 2020. So far wealthy nations have pledged $10.2 billion, a fraction of the debt, according to the new study.
The United States is responsible for about 40 percent of the debt.
The study concludes the carbon debt of high-emitting countries totals 250 billion metric tons of carbon dioxide since 1990. The U.S. government calculates the social cost of CO2 emissions –including property damage from increased flooding, reduced agricultural productivity and adverse effects on human health– is about $40 per metric ton of CO2.
Multiplying the two figures produces the $10 trillion figure.
Others, however, say Matthews’ accounting may be overly simplistic. According to Jan Fuglestvedt research director of the Center for International Climate and Environmental Research in Oslo, Norway, the dates chosen to calculate the debt are arbitrary. Emissions since 1960 account for about 66 percent of CO2 emissions since the start of the industrial era in 1750; emissions since 1990 are 36 percent.
Counting earlier emissions could change the debts owed by different countries, although Fuglestvedt admitted deciding when to start counting is more of a policy choice than a scientific one.
“When should we know and when should we start counting the emissions that change climate?” Fuglestvedt asked. “That goes beyond natural sciences.”
Another issue with the study is counting emissions only by country, said Liane Schalatek, who has attended Green Climate Fund board meetings on behalf of the Heinrich Böll Foundation North America, where she is associate director.
“The biggest polluters in absolute terms are not necessarily countries but entities within countries, that is very often large corporations,” Schalatek said. “If you put their pollution together [they] actually make up the majority of the pollution.”
A 2013 study funded in part by the Böll Foundation found nearly two-thirds of carbon dioxide emitted since the 1750s can be traced to the 90 largest fossil fuel and cement producers, most of which are still operating.
Although the Green Climate Fund does not address corporate responsibility, Schalatek said it is time to stop haggling about where this money will come from and time to start giving larger sums.
“They should really just say 100 billion is the minimum and we should be thinking about how we can scale that up post 2020,” Schalatek said.
Karen Orenstein, an international policy analyst for Friends of the Earth, said, however, that studies like this don’t address the real reason the carbon debt exists.
“A lot of this isn’t really about what science says or academics say,” Orenstein said. “It’s political.”
veryGood! (92674)
Related
- A Mississippi company is sentenced for mislabeling cheap seafood as premium local fish
- County exec sues New York over an order to rescind his ban on transgender female athletes
- I Shop Fashion for a Living, and I Predict These Chic H&M Finds Will Sell Out Quick
- Lance Bass says new NSYNC song on Justin Timberlake's upcoming album made his mom cry
- Woman dies after Singapore family of 3 gets into accident in Taiwan
- France enshrines women's constitutional right to an abortion in a global first
- 'Me hate shrinkflation!': Cookie Monster complains about US economy, White House responds
- Every way dancer Kameron Saunders has said 'like ever' on Taylor Swift's Eras Tour
- EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back
- NFL rumors: Saquon Barkley expected to have multiple suitors in free agency
Ranking
- San Francisco names street for Associated Press photographer who captured the iconic Iwo Jima photo
- Haley’s exit from the GOP race pushes off — again — the day Americans could elect a woman president
- Hits, Flops and Other Illusions: Director Ed Zwick on a life in Hollywood
- Retired US Air Force colonel shared top-secret intel via foreign dating platform, feds say
- Taylor Swift Eras Archive site launches on singer's 35th birthday. What is it?
- Michelle Williams from Destiny's Child jokes 'no one recognizes me' in new Uber One ad
- Nutritional yeast is a favorite among vegans. Does that mean it’s good for you?
- Guns, ammo and broken knife parts were found in the home where an Amish woman was slain, police said
Recommendation
What were Tom Selleck's juicy final 'Blue Bloods' words in Reagan family
Mexican gray wolves boost their numbers, but a lack of genetic diversity remains a threat
Meta attorneys ask judge to dismiss shareholder suit alleging failure to address human trafficking
Ranking all the winners of the Academy Award for best actor over the past 25 years
Intellectuals vs. The Internet
Kelly Osbourne Details Sid Wilson Romance Journey After Fight Over Son's Name Change
Gas chemicals investigated as cause of fire and explosions at suburban Detroit building
What is a whale native to the North Pacific doing off New England? Climate change could be the key